Tenth Circuit· 4/23/2010
United States v. Batton
Citations
- 602 F.3d 1191
- 602 F. Supp. 3d 1191
- 82 Fed. R. Serv. 453
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8509
- 2010 WL 1632931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no error in district court’s admitting evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction for sexual abuse
- permitting testimony to “dispel any of the juror’s misconceptions” about sex offenders
- rejecting argument that Rules 413–415 do not apply on the ground that, regardless of whether the elements of the charged crime include “conduct contemplated by Rule 413,” the charged conduct meets “Rule 413’s internal definition of sexual assault”
- “the process whereby a sex offender earns the trust and confidence of a victim before engaging in a sexual act”
- “The methods sex offenders use are not necessarily common knowledge.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Baldock, Tymkovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ConyacColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-01-30· cited 901×
- Romero v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-05-01· cited 780×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-12-07· cited 92×
- United States v. IrvingTenth Circuit· 2011-11-29· cited 84×
- United States v. WatsonTenth Circuit· 2014-09-11· cited 63×
- United States v. FordTenth Circuit· 2010-07-27· cited 62×
- United States v. IsabellaTenth Circuit· 2019-03-12· cited 58×
- United States v. SturmTenth Circuit· 2012-03-13· cited 53×
- United States v. BearTenth Circuit· 2014-10-31· cited 48×
- United States v. DouganTenth Circuit· 2012-07-10· cited 29×
- United States v. WillistonTenth Circuit· 2017-07-05· cited 25×
- State v. McFarlandWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2011-11-23· cited 24×
- United States v. MunozTenth Circuit· 2016-02-09· cited 21×
- United States v. MuñozTenth Circuit· 2016-02-09· cited 20×
- United States v. DavisSecond Circuit· 2010-11-05· cited 19×
- Jackson-Cobb v. Sprint United ManagementD. Colorado· 2016-03-28· cited 18×
- United States v. DunnTenth Circuit· 2015-02-10· cited 16×
- United States v. PerraultTenth Circuit· 2021-04-21· cited 13×
- United States v. RichardsTenth Circuit· 2020-05-06· cited 12×
- United States v. GaudetFirst Circuit· 2019-08-01· cited 10×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- United States v. CastilloTenth Circuit· 1998-04-06· cited 301×
- United States v. Rodriguez-FelixTenth Circuit· 2006-06-02· cited 221×
- United States v. Kerry Neil EnjadyTenth Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 196×
- United States v. HittFifth Circuit· 2006-12-15· cited 171×
- United States v. Larry M. McDonaldTenth Circuit· 1991-05-31· cited 152×
- United States v. GuardiaTenth Circuit· 1998-02-02· cited 135×
- United States v. Charles William KunzmanTenth Circuit· 1995-04-26· cited 133×
- United States v. MeachamTenth Circuit· 1997-06-24· cited 121×
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne StigerTenth Circuit· 2005-06-30· cited 102×
- United States v. BedfordTenth Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 92×
- United States v. CrockettTenth Circuit· 2006-01-31· cited 82×
- United States v. Richard RomeroSeventh Circuit· 1999-08-31· cited 72×
- United States v. Scott HaywardThird Circuit· 2004-03-05· cited 64×
- United States v. BenallyTenth Circuit· 2007-08-29· cited 63×
- United States v. Lopez-DeLeonFifth Circuit· 2008-01-09· cited 26×
- Ellis v. EmeryNinth Circuit· 2008-06-09· cited 10×
Other cases named United States v. Batton
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.