· 1/14/2011
United States v. Batti
Citations
- 631 F.3d 371
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 674
- 2011 WL 111745
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court asking “[a]nything else concerning sentence?” did not meet the Bostic requirement
- affirming a conviction under § 1030(a)(2)(C), (c)(2)(B)(iii
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Gibbons, McKeague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.