Skip to main content
· 1/14/2011

United States v. Batti

Citations

  • 631 F.3d 371
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 674
  • 2011 WL 111745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court asking “[a]nything else concerning sentence?” did not meet the Bostic requirement
  • affirming a conviction under § 1030(a)(2)(C), (c)(2)(B)(iii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Gibbons, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.