United States v. Battershell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “failing to include a photograph in a warrant application is not fatal to establishing probable cause” because “a judge may properly issue a warrant based on factual descriptions of an image”
• observing that “[t]he first four categories, with the possible exception of the fourth category, ... involve easily identifiable nouns that are hot qualified by amorphous adjectives”
• finding that a “terse description” of an image as “a young female 7 Although the court in United States v. Brunette, 256 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2001
• explaining that “failing to include a photograph in a warrant application is not fatal to establishing probable cause;” “a judge may properly issue a warrant based on factual descriptions of an image.”
• explaining that “failing to include a photograph in a warrant application is not fatal to establishing probable cause;” “a judge may properly issue a warrant based on factual descriptions of an image.”
• finding affidavit sufficient in child pornography case where officer described images as depicting “young female[s] (8-10 YOA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).