Skip to main content
· 11/5/2010

United States v. Battaglia

Citations

  • 624 F.3d 348
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23070
  • 2010 WL 4366206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • double counting may be permissible where the Sentencing Commission intended to attach multiple penalties to the same conduct
  • “If a district court asks counsel ‘whether they have any objections to the sentence just pronounced that have not previously been raised,’ then any sentencing objections raised for the first time on appeal are reviewed under the plain-error standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Griffin, Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.