Skip to main content
· 1/4/2006

United States v. Batie

Citations

  • 433 F.3d 1287
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 66
  • 2006 WL 14569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a 17 1 / /2 -month delay supported the defendant based on the simplicity of the federal charge
  • observing pretrial delay approaching one year sufficient to trigger Barker analysis for determining speedy trial violation
  • “[Defendant’s] persistent requests for continuances, even when opposed, scarcely demonstrate a desire for a speedi er process. Thus, this [third] factor weighs against [him].” (footnote omitted)
  • “A deliberate attempt to delay a trial in order to secure a strategic advantage will weigh heavily against the government, while valid reasons will justify a delay.”
  • “[The defendant’s] persistent requests for continuances . . . scarcely demonstrate a desire for a speedier process.”
  • “The government argues that four months’ delay was caused by [defendant’s] motions for mistrials-and seems to blame him for the delay. However, this time must weigh against the government, although less heavily than deliberate misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCONNELL, McKAY, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.