Skip to main content
· 3/13/1991

United States v. Bartley Walsh A/K/A Barney Walsh

Citations

  • 928 F.2d 7
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 532
  • 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2913
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4056
  • 1991 WL 32336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court did not err as a matter of law in refusing to dismiss an indictment where “a jury could reasonably have concluded” on the evidence at trial that the limitations period had not run
  • \The - 10 - fact that a benign account of the evidence was plausible . . . does not mean that the evidence could not be introduced.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pollak, Selya, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.