Skip to main content
· 1/23/2007

United States v. Barry Trupin

Citations

  • 475 F.3d 71
  • 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 688
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1463
  • 2007 WL 162710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant “in effect stole from his fellow taxpayers through his deceptions” and that “[a] seven-month term of imprisonment fails to reflect as much”
  • noting that the defendant \in effect stole from his fellow taxpayers through his deceptions\ and that \[a] seven-month term of imprisonment fails to reflect as much\
  • “Although the district court considered the section 3553(a) factors as required by Booker, it erred in its conclusion. This case thus turns on the result–the reasonableness of the sentence as a whole–rather than the process that produced it.” (emphasis added)
  • “[T]he NYPD is a non-suable agency of the City.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wesley, Hall, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.