United States v. Barry Robert Drew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a child pornography case, that the district court abused its discretion by departing for susceptibility to abuse in prison based in part on the defendant’s “naivete” when the defendant was “of average size and in good health”
• reversing departure based \simply\ on defendant's status as child pornographer and his naivete where \there is no good reason to believe [defendant] is exceedingly vulnerable to victimization given his average size and good health\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).