United States v. Barry Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that unfairly prejudicial testimony is more likely to violate Rule 403 when it was “introduced merely to bolster the prosecution’s case-in-chief”
• finding no prejudice from a “single slip of the tongue by the trial judge” where the record was otherwise “replete” with correct instructions on the burden of proof
• requiring a hearing outside the jury's presence only when there are \unusual\ cir- cumstances
• admission of evidence of defendant's membership in Aryan Brotherhood inextricably intertwined with establishing motive for crime
• admission of evidence of defendant’s membership in Aryan Brotherhood inextricably intertwined with establishing motive for crime
• to require a hearing out- side the jury's presence, circumstances must be\unusual\ or \particu- larly prejudicial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).