United States v. Barry Mark Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that by “proceed[- ing] to read the [inadmissible hearsay] statement to the jury under the guise of cross-examining . . . [t]he government’s use of [the] unauthenticated statement violated Fed.R.Evid. Rule 802 . . . .”
• it is improper “under the guise of ‘artful cross-examination’ to tell the jury the substance of inadmissible evidence”
• “Protections against the use of privileged and inadmissible evidence would be of little benefit if the prosecutor were allowed, under the guise of ‘artful cross-examination’ to tell the jury the substance of inadmissible evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).