United States v. Barry Keith Wilson, United States of America v. Frederick Fernando McGee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a chemist's testimony identifying the substance as cocaine base without referring to \crack\ was sufficient to support the defendant's sentence under the statutory minimum for cocaine base and the Guideline for crack
• rejecting argument that evidence was insufficient to permit district court to conclude form of cocaine involved was crack; forensic chemist testified substance was cocaine base and conclusion was not contradicted by other evidence
• no error in sentencing pursuant to enhanced statute for cocaine base where uncontradicted trial testimony established substance was cocaine base
• chemist provided uncontradicted testimony that substance was cocaine base; irrelevant that chemist did not specifically say substance was \cocaine base which is the same as crack\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).