United States v. Barry Jordan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 3582(c)(2) did not permit defendant to obtain benefit of U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 departure not applied at original sentencing
• finding it “unfair not to recognize 6 and accommodate th[e] varying spectrum of culpability” when 7 sentencing for a “broad category of conduct” (emphasis added)
• discussing “the discretionary, court- adopted exhaustion rule for ERISA claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).