United States v. Barron D. Fonner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[J]udges may consider prior misconduct despite the defendant's acquittal on charges arising out of the misconduct. Six courts of appeals have so held.\
• ”[J]udges may consider prior misconduct despite the defendant’s acquittal on charges arising out of the misconduct. Six courts of appeals have so held.”
• “[A] defendant’s past cannot justify an increase in criminal history category exceeding the level that would have been appropriate had the facts been counted expressly.”
• “a defendant’s past cannot justify an increase in criminal history category exceeding the level that would have been appropriate had the facts been counted expressly.”
• ‘‘[t]he . . . judge did not abuse his discretion in concluding that [the defendant’s] last-minute apology was a deceitful little show’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).