Skip to main content
· 6/1/1950

United States v. Barowsky

Citations

  • 91 F. Supp. 149
  • 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Paragraph IV certification [under HatchWaxman] would signal the commencement of litigation to any prudent patent holder, this Court holds that any documents created (on or
  • “[A] party must show that there existed an identifiable specific claim of impending litigation when the materials were prepared.”
  • “[A] party must show that there existed an identifiable specific claim of impending litigation when the materials were prepared.”
  • applying Spalding to technical communications other than invention records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wyzanski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.