Skip to main content
· 9/23/1991

United States v. Barker Steel Co.

Citations

  • 774 F. Supp. 65
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13398
  • 1991 WL 191415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that ALJ properly considered that claimant was able to care for her grandchildren, socialize with family, and care for herself
  • affirming an ALJ’s decision to discredit a plaintiff’s credibility, in part, because “the [p]laintiff’s failure to seek followup treatment for alleged physical ailments contradicted his claims of total disability and severe symptoms.”
  • “It is within the province of the ALJ to weigh conflicting evidence in the record and credit that which is more persuasive and consistent with the record as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.