Skip to main content
· 6/21/1928

United States v. Barbini

Citations

  • 26 F.2d 237
  • 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “a labor organization with fewer than fifteen employees cannot be sued as an employer for discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act”
  • holding \a labor organization with fewer than fifteen employees cannot be sued as an employer for discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act\
  • upholding district court’s finding that the filing of disciplinary charges against an employee was not adverse action where the charges had not been adjudicated
  • affirming dismissal of retaliation claim because “the charges had not yet been adjudicated and . . . if the charges were ultimately dismissed, [plaintiff] would not have suffered any adverse effect from them”
  • denial of leave to amend based in part on court's belief that amendment would be futile
  • denial of leave to amend based in part on court’s belief that amendment would be futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Louderback

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.