· 6/21/1928
United States v. Barbini
Citations
- 26 F.2d 237
- 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “a labor organization with fewer than fifteen employees cannot be sued as an employer for discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act”
- holding \a labor organization with fewer than fifteen employees cannot be sued as an employer for discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act\
- upholding district court’s finding that the filing of disciplinary charges against an employee was not adverse action where the charges had not been adjudicated
- affirming dismissal of retaliation claim because “the charges had not yet been adjudicated and . . . if the charges were ultimately dismissed, [plaintiff] would not have suffered any adverse effect from them”
- denial of leave to amend based in part on court's belief that amendment would be futile
- denial of leave to amend based in part on court’s belief that amendment would be futile
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Louderback
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.