Skip to main content
· 3/23/1994

United States v. Barbara Vanhorn

Citations

  • 20 F.3d 104
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5398
  • 1994 WL 92171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • giving “particular deference to 21 credibility determinations that are based on the 3 1 adjudicator’s observation of the applicant’s demeanor”
  • there was no agency action to review where no request had been made of the Secretary
  • there was no agency action to review where no request had been made of the Secretary
  • “appeal may be made to the Secretary ***, who in proper circumstances may cancel, waive, or suspend the scholar’s obligation”
  • substantial compliance, economic duress, and estoppel are not valid defenses under the statutory scheme creating the NHSC scholarship program
  • under the National Health Service Corps program, scholarship recipients may not “unilaterally, without proper approval, decide where they wish to serve if the program is to be effective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powell, Widener, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.