· 3/27/1985
United States v. Barbara Fama
Citations
- 758 F.2d 834
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the fact that a suspect’s “innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged [] does not negate probable cause” to arrest
- suggesting that size of narcotics trafficking scheme may be factor relevant to probability that contraband will be located at trafficker's residence
- issue is “whether under the circumstances a reasonably well-trained officer would have held an objectively reasonable belief that there was probable cause to search”
- “[a]n agent’s expert opinion is an important factor to be considered by the judge reviewing a warrant application”
- “The fact that an innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged ... does not negate probable cause.”
- agent’s expert opinion as to where criminals likely to keep evidence of their illegal activity is an important factor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Kearse, Cardamone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.