Skip to main content
· 3/27/1985

United States v. Barbara Fama

Citations

  • 758 F.2d 834
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the fact that a suspect’s “innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged [] does not negate probable cause” to arrest
  • suggesting that size of narcotics trafficking scheme may be factor relevant to probability that contraband will be located at trafficker's residence
  • issue is “whether under the circumstances a reasonably well-trained officer would have held an objectively reasonable belief that there was probable cause to search”
  • “[a]n agent’s expert opinion is an important factor to be considered by the judge reviewing a warrant application”
  • “The fact that an innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged ... does not negate probable cause.”
  • agent’s expert opinion as to where criminals likely to keep evidence of their illegal activity is an important factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Kearse, Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.