United States v. Barbara Eunice Carrasco, United States of America v. Barbara Eunice Carrasco and German Rivera-Jiminez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where defendant reasonably but mistakenly believed that she entered into a conditional plea, the sentence must be vacated and the defendant allowed to plead anew
• “We do not have jurisdiction to decide Carrasco’s appeal of the denial of the suppression motion unless she entered a valid conditional plea.”
• “We do not have jurisdiction to decide Carrasco’s appeal of the denial of the suppression motion unless she entered a valid conditional plea.”
• “We do not have jurisdiction to decide Carrasco’s appeal ... unless she entered a valid conditional plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).