United States v. Barbara Coney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to strike where “disputed statements were material and pertinent to the underlying controversy”
• holding that filings that “offend[ed] the sensibilities” of a party were not scandalous because they were directly relevant to the controversy at issue and minimally supported in the record
• stating that the Fifth Circuit “review[s] a district court's ruling on a motion to strike for abuse of discretion.”
• stating that the Fifth Circuit “review[s] a district court’s ruling on a motion to strike for abuse of discretion.”
• stating that the Fifth Circuit “review[s] a district court’s ruling on a motion to strike for abuse of discretion.”
• stating that the Fifth Circuit “review[s] a district court’s ruling on a motion to strike for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).