United States v. Barahona-Montenegro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for resentencing where the “district court’s oral sentence fail[ed] to calculate clearly the appropriate Guidelines range, but also [did not] adequately explain the chosen sentence”
• remanding for resentencing where the “district court’s oral sentence fail[ed] to calculate clearly the appropriate Guidelines range, but also [did not] adequately explain the chosen sentence”
• characterizing as irrelevant the number of children fathered by defendant out of wedlock
• remanding for failure to calculate the guidelines range and explain the sentence
• re- versing sentence imposed in part because of “irrelevant factors” like hav- ing fathered five children out of wedlock
• re- versing sentence imposed in part because of “irrelevant factors” like hav- ing fathered five children out of wedlock

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).