United States v. Bank of North Wilkesboro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The consultative expert] would be required to respond to questions propounded to him as to facts known and opinions held prior to his involvement as an expert in the underlying litigation.”
• “[T]he mere designation by a party of a trial witness as an ‘expert’ does not thereby transmute the experience that the expert witness acquired as an actor into experience that he acquired in anticipation of litigation or for trial”
• inventor in patent infringement suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).