Skip to main content
· 11/11/1912

United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad

Citations

  • 226 U.S. 14
  • 33 S. Ct. 5
  • 57 L. Ed. 104
  • 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2128

Syllabus

<p>Under § 7 of the act of June 18, 1910, 36 Stat. 539, 547, c. 309, the Interstate Commerce Commission cannot require a main trunk road to make switch connections with a road which is not actually at the time a lateral branch road.</p> <p>In this case held, that a railroad parallel with a main trunk line and operated by a traction company as an independent venture and not as a mere feeder was not a lateral branch railroad within the meaning of § 7 of the act of June.18, Í910.</p> <p>An'order to maintain through rates incident to a requirement to make switch connections is incidental thereto and falls with it.</p> <p>Qitcere whether parties are bound in a higher court by findings based on specific investigations made by the lower tribunal without notice. See Oregon R. R. Co. v. Fairchild, 224 U. S. 510, 525.</p>

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.