Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1/16/2001

United States v. Baldwin

Citations

54 M.J. 308
2001 CAAF LEXIS 38
2001 WL 38118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“We have long held that the use of command meetings to purposefully influence the members in determining a court- martial sentence violates, Article 37, UCMJ.”
“We have never held that an issue of unlawful command influence arising during trial may be waived by a failure to object or call the matter to the trial judge’s attention.”
“We have never held that an issue of unlawful command influence arising dur- ing trial may be waived by a failure to object or call the matter to the trial judge’s attention.”
“We reject the Government’s claim of waiver. We have never held that an issue of unlawful command influence arising during trial may be waived by a failure to object or call the matter to the trial judge’s attention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.