Skip to main content
· 4/28/1999

United States v. Baldev Raj Bhutani, Neelam Bhutani, and Alra Laboratories, Inc.

Citations

  • 175 F.3d 572
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8133
  • 1999 WL 250242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Brady material must be: “(1) in the possession of the prosecution; (2) material; and (3) exculpatory”
  • observing that even if the prosecution has only consulted with a government agency on a case, the agency is considered part of the prosecution and informa- tion within the agency’s knowledge and control will be imputed to the prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.