Skip to main content
· 9/12/2001

United States v. Baldev R. Bhutani and Alra Laboratories, Incorporated

Citations

  • 266 F.3d 661
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20623
  • 2001 WL 1084907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We agree with the district court’s determination of what constitutes loss in this sort of case, and that the defendant’s gain is the appropriate measure of that loss.”
  • \[T]here was indeed loss to consumers because consumers bought drugs under the false belief that they were in full compliance with the law.\
  • “[H]ere consumers bargained for FDA-approved drugs that were in compliance with the law. This they did not get. We agree with the district court’s determination of what constitutes loss in this sort of case, and that the defendant’s gain is the appropriate measure of that loss.”
  • questions of law reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.