· 3/29/1963
United States v. Back
Citations
- 13 C.M.A. 568
- 13 USCMA 568
- 33 C.M.R. 100
- 1963 CMA LEXIS 281
- 1963 WL 4821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the key dates [regarding post-infringement compensation] are the delivery dates, not the contract dates.”
- approving the use of a Moody’s interest rate in a patent infringement case, “unless a party affirmatively demonstrates that a different rate should be applied”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferguson, Kilday, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.