Skip to main content
· 3/29/1963

United States v. Back

Citations

  • 13 C.M.A. 568
  • 13 USCMA 568
  • 33 C.M.R. 100
  • 1963 CMA LEXIS 281
  • 1963 WL 4821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the key dates [regarding post-infringement compensation] are the delivery dates, not the contract dates.”
  • approving the use of a Moody’s interest rate in a patent infringement case, “unless a party affirmatively demonstrates that a different rate should be applied”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferguson, Kilday, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.