United States v. Bach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the interested public was notified of Customs’ tariff modification by way of the agency’s implementation of the court’s decision; thus solicitation of comments under § 1625(c) was not required
• “Customs is merely implementing this court’s interpretation of [the statute], an interpretation that . . . Customs is required to follow.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).