Skip to main content

United States v. Baba

Citations

  • 21 M.J. 76
  • 1985 CMA LEXIS 13979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • regulatory violation charged under Article 92 and violation of 18 USC § 793(d), charged under Article 134, held multiplicious for findings, but preemption not considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Everett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.