United States v. Azuara-Paz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the inquiry notice standard for Exchange Act claims extends to claims brought under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2
• noting that most courts in this District do not require an allegation of culpable participation in respect of Section 15(a) claims
• “Having satisfied Article Ill’s standing criteria, the dissimilarities between the tranches is an issue appropriately left to the class certification stage” (citation omitted)
• declining to strike portions of the operative complaint “that rely on allegations put forth in other litigants’ complaints”
• considering whether Bear Sterns’s mortgage-backed securities registration statements contained misrepresentations and omissions
• “[AJbsent a decline in the Certificates’ ratings (or some other indicator of a steep decline in the Certificates’ value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).