United States v. Avtar Singh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court’s factual findings on a suppression motion are reviewed for clear error
• stating that the district court’s factual findings on a suppression motion are reviewed for clear error
• explaining that “Border Patrol operations along inland routes—not at the border or its functional equivalent—including . . . roving patrols are held to a higher standard”
• “[O]fficers are entitled to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that might well elude an untrained person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).