United States v. August L. Holthaus, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restitution for legal fees incurred by a bankruptcy trustee Was valid because the fees were a direct result of the defendant’s fraud
• holding that intended loss included amounts that the government and the bankruptcy trustee could not find after a diligent search
• observing in bankruptcy fraud context that the \face value of [a] concealed inheritance\ is prima facie evidence of intended loss where defendant has not shown \he intended to defraud\ a lesser amount
• “[T]he district court determined [the defendant’s] subjective intent based on the available evidence.”
• “[T]he district court determined [the defendant’s] subjective intent based on the available evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).