United States v. Aubrey E. Pierson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “so-called opinion rule” was “not strictly followed—due in large part to the difficulty of drawing a fine distinction between fact and opinion”
• \ ‘It is hardly ever reversible error to admit such evidence; its foundation may generally be as conveniently left to cross-examination.' \
• \ 'It is hardly ever reversible error to admit such evidence; its foundation may generally be as conveniently left to crossexamination.' \
• trial judge should have broad discretion and \[o]nly a clear abuse of discretion\ warrants reversal
• emphasizing trial court's broad discretion in this area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).