United States v. Aubrey Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] district court can satisfy the requirements of the Bostic rule only by clearly asking for objections to the sentence that have not been previously raised”
• holding that the question “Anything else, Ms. Goode?” did not satisfy Bostic
• holding that “Anything else, [counsel]?” did not satisfy Bostic
• “[A]n issue is deemed forfeited . . . if it is merely mentioned and not developed.”
• “[A]n issue is deemed forfeited on appeal if it is merely mentioned and not developed.”
• “A district court can satisfy the requirements of the Bostic rule only by clearly asking for objections to the sentence that have not been previously raised.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).