Skip to main content
· 3/20/2008

United States v. At&t Inc.

Citations

  • 541 F. Supp. 2d 2
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21575
  • 2008 WL 740568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “However, as a lay person, an ALJ is ‘simply not qualified to 8 interpret raw medical data in functional terms.’”
  • ALJ is not qualified to extrapolate functional 3 limitations from raw medical data

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.