United States v. Asta M. Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding on near-identical facts that defendant -7- had voluntarily consented to additional questioning by a police officer during a routine traffic stop
• finding that officer’s contemporaneous statements limited scope of consent
• listing relevant considerations as including the presence of more than one officer, display of a weapon, physical touching, and use of commanding language
• “an officer must return a driver’s documentation before a detention can end”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).