United States v. Assets Described in \Attachment A\ to the Verified Complaint Forfeiture in Rem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the same argument and stating “whether Kinetic is an ‘owner’ is not germane to the issue of whether it has statutory standing to contest the forfeiture.”
• “In order to establish an innocent owner defense under Section 983(d)(3)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).