Skip to main content
· 11/29/1989

United States v. Ashimi

Citations

  • 725 F. Supp. 389
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14324
  • 1989 WL 144968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it was not disputed that plaintiffs had a mark in the term “EXPRESS” although it was argued that plaintiff had abandoned the mark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bua

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.