United States v. Asher Adkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the evidence could support the jury’s verdict where the Government introduced, among other things, evidence of the defendant’s standardized dealings with coconspirators, the length of the defendant's involvement, and the quantities of drugs involved
• holding that in light of Apprendi, failure to submit quantity of drug issue to jury constituted error and “error is plain, and that the error, which added seven years to [defendant’s] sentence af- fected a substantial right . . .”
• reasoning that traveling with coconspirator to purchase drugs supported conspiracy conviction
• affirming based on “large quantities,” standardized transactions, and credit sales, and discussing factors
• affirming based on “large quantities,” standardized transactions, and credit sales, and discussing factors
• affirming based on “large quantities,” standardized transactions, and credit sales, and discussing factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).