United States v. Arturo Gonzalez and Ricardo Ramirez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that government’s concession that defendant’s conduct did not constitute “use” of a firearm does not obviate the need for independent review on appeal
• noting that government's concession that defendant's conduct did not constitute \use\ of a firearm does not obviate the need for independent review on appeal
• permitting retrial where the Supreme Court abrogated the Seventh Circuit’s definition of “use” for a drug offense after trial
• proof at trial rendered insufficient because of intervening Supreme Court decision in Bailey, 516 U.S. 137
• “Because there is independent corroborating evidence of the guilt [of the defendants], there is no reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different had the undisclosed impeachment material been disclosed prior to trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).