United States v. Arturo Cancino-Trinidad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the district court’s adoption of the PSR generally supports the inference that it took into account the sentencing considerations contained therein
• holding deportable defendant’s “criminal record 2 Case: 25-50100 Document: 59-1 Page: 3 Date Filed: 11/17/2025 No. 25-50100 support[ed] a finding that the imposition of [supervised release] would provide an added measure of deterrence . . .” (citation omitted)
• “A sentencing error affects a defendant’s substantial rights if he can show a reasonable probability that, but for the district court’s misapplication of the Guidelines, he would have received a lesser sentence.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).