United States v. Articles of Drug, Etc. Appeal of the Lannett Company, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing the district court, which had “entered no findings of fact as to misbranding” and did not consider the “argument that the drugs were labeled sufficiently for lay use,” to “consider these factors” on remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).