United States v. Arthur Turcks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court's failure to make factual findings under the VWPA constitutes plain error
• \The rule of lenity `demands resolution of ambiguities in criminal statutes in favor of the defendant.' \
• plain error in jury instruction occurs when error “affected the outcome of the District Court proceedings” (quoting United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).