Skip to main content
· 3/11/1975

United States v. Arthur R. Black

Citations

  • 512 F.2d 864
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing a burden shifting statute as a presumption, because it “operates precisely like” a presumption, although not worded in presumptive language
  • this case demonstrates how the Government’s own evidence may be sufficient to raise the exception and thus require that the Government negative the exception beyond a reasonable doubt
  • discussing the meaning of a legal presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merrill, Koelsch, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.