United States v. Arthur Lee Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “ § 3582(e)(3)’s statutory máximums apply in the aggregate” for sentences imposed on multiple revocations of supervised release
• explaining that an inmate’s claim relating to credit for time served is properly brought in a § 2241 petition
• “statutory caps [post PROTECT Act] explicitly apply to each revocation of super vised release”
• “Congress did 12240 UNITED STATES v. KNIGHT eventually amend § 3583(e)(3) so that the statutory caps now explicitly apply to each revocation of supervised release.”
• “Until Williams exhausts his administrative remedies, this issue is not ripe for judicial review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).