United States v. Arthur L. Hollis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury instruction errors are harmless when there is “overwhelming and uncon- tradicted evidence at trial” concerning the omitted element
• holding that jury instruction errors are harmless when there is “overwhelming and uncon- tradicted evidence at trial” concerning the omitted element
• holding that Apprendi error was harmless where there was “overwhelming and uncontradicted evidence at trial” of the identity of the drug that the defendant distributed
• finding an Apprendi error where the indictment failed to allege, and the jury did not find, drug type with adequate specificity, but holding that this error was harmless
• finding an Apprendi error where the indictment failed to allege, and the jury did not find, drug type with ade- quate specificity, but holding that this error was harmless
• “[C]oeaine and cocaine base are chemically identical. If any form of cocaine base qualifies for the enhanced penalties under the statute, then subsection (iii) swallows subsection (ii).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).