United States v. Arthur Fletcher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that variance violates defendant's rights only if he can prove he was preju- diced by variance
• holding that vari- ance violates defendant's rights only if he can prove he was preju- diced by variance
• stating that, because the amendment relied on by the movant was listed in § 1B1.10, \a sentence reduction is authorized . . . pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)\
• “Congress has not further subdivided live marijuana plants into growing plants and cut plants.”
• \Congress has not further subdivided live marijuana plants into growing plants and cut plants.\
• “When a defendant is convicted of charges not included in the indictment, an amendment has occurred which is per se reversible error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).