Skip to main content
· 3/11/2015

United States v. Arthur Chappell

Citations

  • 779 F.3d 872
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3763
  • 2015 WL 1035876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness when superseding indictment secured after successful appeal includes both original and new charges
  • explaining the proper standard of appellate review on vindictive prosecution claims
  • presumption of regularity supports prosecutorial decisions absent clear, contrary evidence
  • discussing defendant’s “heavy” evidentiary burden to prove prosecutorial vindictiveness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Smith, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.