· 3/11/2015
United States v. Arthur Chappell
Citations
- 779 F.3d 872
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3763
- 2015 WL 1035876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness when superseding indictment secured after successful appeal includes both original and new charges
- explaining the proper standard of appellate review on vindictive prosecution claims
- presumption of regularity supports prosecutorial decisions absent clear, contrary evidence
- discussing defendant’s “heavy” evidentiary burden to prove prosecutorial vindictiveness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Smith, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.