United States v. Arthur Berardelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in the Tramunti decision suggests that the result in that case would be the same if it could not have been' independently determined that the immunized testimony is false.”
• truthful immunized testimony may not be used to prove an earlier or later perjury but untruthful testimony may subject witness to prosecution for perjury
• “[T]he crime of criminal contempt requires a specific intent to consciously disregard an order of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).