United States v. Artemus E. Ward, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the use of wires need only be reasonably foreseeable
• “It is not an amendment to a charge to ‘drop from an indictment those allegations that are unnecessary to an offense that is clearly contained within the indictment.’” (alteration adopted) (quoting Miller, 471 U.S. at 144)
• wire fraud requires proof that defendant (1) intentionally participated in scheme to defraud and (2) used or caused use of 11 Case: 16-17006 Date Filed: 07/30/2019 Page: 12 of 40 the wires for purpose of executing that scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).